For those that don’t know what Disqus is, Disqus is a free, ad-free versatile commenting system for web site content management systems, such as Wordpress (which is what powers aintageek.com). What it does is replace the commenting system with it’s own system. Their system is currently the absolute best, as it allows people to login from existing social networking sites such as Facebook, Twitter, etc. Comment management is done via it’s web site, and if you have multiple web site, like me (theNeocell.com, aintageek.com) that use Disqus, you can manage all new comments from the same place.
So if you browse to either theNeocell.com or aintageek.com from an iPhone or iPod Touch, you’ll notice the site has a mobile version that’s optimized for the iOS. The one thing that wasn’t optimized for mobile, though, was Disqus. It still wasn’t too bad, I mean I had replied to comments from Disqus on the Neocell… but it clearly didn’t look or feel the best.
But recently Disqus got a mobile facelift. When Disqus detects an iOS device, it switches to a mobile interface. Now it’s not only optimized for iOS devices, but it actually matches the mobile theme of both theNeocell.com and aintageek.com. Fact, it blends in perfectly. Disqus really feels like it’s part of the system.
Another great thing is that, because Disqus’s interface exists on their servers, whenever there’s an update from them, it happens automatically. You don’t have to do anything to get the updates or improvements. I dig that.
Keep up the good work Disqus.
Peace, JbB
Posted in Tips on 09. Jun, 2010
So I helped my bud pick out his new iPhone 3GS 16GB from eBay. It came time for him to setup an iTunes account. Only problem is, he doesn’t have a credit card. But that’s no problem.
Creating an iTunes account without a credit card
It’s pretty simple. We’re going to do everything by getting an iTunes gift card. So head down to almost anywhere and pick one up.
- Download and install iTunes
- Open the iTunes program on your computer
- Click on the iTunes Store
- Click on “Redeem”
- Enter the information from the gift card
- At the sign in screen, click the “Create an Account” button off to the side
- Enter your information
- At the bottom it’ll have credit card icons, which are now optional, just hit “Continue” without entering any credit card info
And there ya go. That’s all ya gotta’ do. Hit me up if I missed anything. Let me know if this helped ya or follow me at twitter.com/johnBbaird .
Peace, JbB
(HTML5 Elvis don’t play ’round with Flash y’all.)
Steve Jobs was talking to reporters and he had mentioned how he thought that people at Adobe were lazy for not fixing Adobe Flash security issues and all this stuff. We, as PC users, experience that (that’s where some spyware comes in now, is through Flash). He also said that’s the biggest reason why Macs crash is because of Flash issues.
He said he expects the death of Flash to happen at some point, and mentioned about how HTML5 is the future of the web. What is HTML5?
HTML5 is the proposed next standard for HTML 4.01, XHTML 1.0 and DOM Level 2 HTML. It aims to reduce the need for proprietary plug-in-based rich internet application (RIA) technologies such as Adobe Flash, Microsoft Silverlight, and Sun JavaFX.
In the iPhone OS 3.0 update almost a year ago, the iPhone became the first (and still one of the only) phones to support true HTML5. Google Chrome gets the honor of being the first HTML5 browser also. In fact, only two browsers support HTML5 right now, Chrome and Safari (computer browser).
Well it appears Google agrees with this too, not just the fact that they included HTML5 in Chrome “lightyears” before any other browsers (Firefox still don’t support it), but they’re experimenting running Youtube without Flash. How would they do it without Flash? With HTML5. Yeah, it’s not just a pipe dream, you can test it out for yourself. You’ll need either the latest Chrome or Safari to view it. It has limited functionality because not only is it an experiment, but it’s also the first of its kind to render video via HTML5. If you’re running Google Chrome (nudge, nudge), open up a new Incognito Window to test out HTML5 Youtube, because Youtube will set all videos to render in HTML5 (which would be fine, except they don’t have full screen). That way, when you close the Incognito Window of Google Chrome, your Youtube videos will still be rendered in Flash.
I tried it out and man, it’s really nice! I mean, I can’t believe I was watching video WITHOUT Flash! Right click on the video and none of that “Adobe 10 settings…” or whatever crap you normally see.
I personally began to hate Flash the day I first got the Neocell, my iPhone. I realized why iPhones, and all other phones, don’t display Flash. Flash is a huge, horrible performance hog and although it allows you to do things on the web you could never do before, it also is limiting the web at the same time.
Like for instance, if I wanted to visit a web page from my smart phone, if that web site uses Flash in order to navigate, your instantly shut right the freak down from using the web site. I remember an auto parts suppler had their “find a part” done in Flash and it’s like, why do I need Flash to just find a part? I understand if you wanna’ watch a movie, such as on Hulu or Youtube… great, use Flash. Flash is great for video content, or playin’ browser games. Perfect, fine. But everything else impedes the internet.
Flash is the most unoptimized and performance demanding thing we experience on the web. The future of the web, a few years ago, was hailed at Flash. That would normally be true, I mean computers just keep getting faster and faster, so why not encode and render the entire web as Flash? Well you know what happened? Smartphones happened. Now the “cutting edge web browsing” was on devices powerful enough to render everything from the web, except for Flash. Flash is so horrible for smartphones that smartphones ban flash completely. The world took note of this and started advising everyone “If you want to build a web site for the future, don’t build it with Flash”.
Then another thing happened, those “fast computers” started getting… slower! Introducing the netbook, little, weak laptops that were designed for the web mainly (but were amazingly cheap, thin, light, portable and also had very long battery life). Netbooks are more than powerful enough to do the web, but Flash caused issues. A netbook can play music and have five tabs of non-Flash web sites open no prob, but start throwing a Flash site in there and the user can literally feel their performance take a hit. So more and more people started recommending web sites be built without Flash.
Now, the only thing Flash is recommended for is media delivery. Pandora runs Flash, Youtube runs Flash, etc. But smartphones have found a way to get those services with apps that access those services directly (known as “API”), and it does it all without Flash.
So users are starting to see less and less of a dependence on Flash. And from what I saw with Google’s HTML5 version of Youtube, I suspect to see the end of Adobe Flash in maybe two or three years.
That may seem crazy, but a few years back, there was the “plug-in web”. You had video content from the web that required plug-ins to run. Joost was a service that required a plug-in to run, and at the same time, it’s competitor was Youtube… Youtube didn’t need a plug-in to run as it ran on Flash, so that meant that anyone could access Youtube as long as they had Flash installed. Not only that, but any other web sites that ran on Flash would run without the user having to install anything extra. So with the installation of this “one plug-in called Flash”, hundreds of web sites could be run. You could access Youtube on granny’s computer because you didn’t have to install anything, but granny sure ‘nough didn’t want her daughter’s youngin’s installing something on her computer for something called “Joost”. (Joost, by the way, later saw the error of their ways and incorporated Flash, but by then, Joost already had one foot in the grave.)
So Flash killed the even more “evil” plug-in era of the internet. That was just about four or five years ago. I think it’s not far-fetched at all to see the same happen to Flash with HTML5. In fact, just like I sang praises of joy at the death of the plug-in web, I’m gonna’ sing praises of joy at the death of the Flash web. Although I love me some Flash-driven Hulu, I honestly believe that Flash is the new evil technology of the web.
When conversations come up about Flash or the future of the web, mention what you read here and express your own predictions and hopes for the future of the web. And at the very least, keep paying attention to more and more web sites that increase functionality and interactivity without the use of Flash. If you think I’m right or think I’m wrong, let’s here it.
Peace, JbB
I hate news papers, almost with a passion. But I subscribe to the Tampa Bay Business Journal. I think the Business Journal is a great resource to the business community and also is a really interesting source of information.
But check this out… look at the front of the paper, and then look at their “STAY IN TOUCH” area to the top right.
The Tampa Bay Business Journal is smart by listing social media methods on how you can get information from them. They got the usual suspects… Twitter, Facebook, RSS, E-mail… but they also included the social media network iPhone. Wait… the iPhone is a social media network? That’s right, it’s not. The iPhone is a device, a platform… like Macintosh OSX or Windows 7. The reason why they put “iPhone” on there is because they have a mobile version that’s more or less designed for iPhones.
So do I think the Tampa Bay Business Journal should change this, or that this is an incorrect way to display “media forms”, such as Twitter, Facebook, ect? Na… I actually think this is a good idea. It’s actually surprising. It shows a slow change in the way we view devices and connectivity.
Since when do we see a particulate device listed in a way like this? We’re starting to get more and more used to moving out of our “PC” and more into different forms of how we get our information. I think of the Amazon Kindle as another example. Book publishers, retailers, etc are starting to list the “Kindle” as a method for how you can get a book. “Available in paperback, hardback, and Kindle”. That’s stupid, right? The “Kindle” is just a device and it accepts a certain eBook format… why not just say “eBook” and let that be known you most likely support the Kindle format? Or how about just say “eBook Readers”? Because… for one, they may not support all eBook reader devices, and frankly… they don’t care. They only care about the Amazon Kindle because that’s the device almost everyone uses if they have an eBook reader device. There’s ways to read eBooks on competing eBook reader devices, ways to read eBooks on your PC, laptop or netbook, apps so that you can read eBooks on your smartphones, including iPhones. But combine all those sources, and they don’t compare to the numbers using the Kindle to read eBooks. So they care about letting people know, first and foremost, that their book is available on the Kindle.
This is the effect popular, industry-shifting devices such as the iPhone and the Kindle are having. It’s really funny to see a particular device mentioned in the way iPhone or Kindles are… but this is the change that’s happening with our technical society.
One piece of recommendation to any businesses thinking about displaying something like this with their media, product, etc… listing one particularly popular platform or device may possibly alienate people who don’t use the device (iPhone vs. Android for example). My recommendation instead of listing “iPhone” would be to list something like “Mobile devices such as iPhones” or “eBook readers such as Kindle”, etc. That way, you don’t promise to support all devices, but also give hope to people to check out your product on their devices. In the Tampa Bay Business Journal’s case, instead of “iPhone” with a picture of an iPhone, I would have it say “Mobile” with a picture of an iPhone. iPhone users, their main target, would clearly know iPhones are supported, but it’s also not alienating to Android, Black Berry or Palm owners (whether or not they even have a mobile version for them).
Peace, JbB
